About Book

Neigenfind’s article examines the ethical weight of nonviolence and pacifism within Christian and Buddhist traditions. The author explores whether adherence to nonviolent principles constitutes a moral obligation (required for ethical life) or a supererogatory act (beyond duty, virtuous but optional). Through comparative analysis, the article highlights similarities and differences between the two traditions: • In Christianity, nonviolence is examined through the lens of Jesus’ teachings and pacifist theologians. • In Buddhism, the principle of ahimsa and the broader ethical framework of compassion and karma are considered. Neigenfind argues that understanding nonviolence as supererogatory or obligatory has practical implications for both personal moral development and broader social engagement. The discussion situates interfaith ethical discourse as central to advancing nonviolent thought across cultural and religious boundaries. The article is particularly relevant today in multicultural and religiously plural societies, where ethical frameworks can guide responses to violence, extremism, and social conflict. Community engagement mechanisms include: • Use in interfaith education programs to teach ethical reasoning about nonviolence. • Development of youth peace workshops integrating Christian and Buddhist perspectives on ethical living. • Contribution to curriculum design in comparative religion and moral philosophy courses. • Guidance for religious leaders and community organizers in promoting ethical, nonviolent responses to societal issues. This article provides a focused, comparative ethical analysis bridging Christian and Buddhist moral philosophy. It is a valuable addition to GRACE for its relevance to interfaith dialogue, nonviolence scholarship, and ethical guidance against extremism.