About Article

increased attention to racialized knowledge and methodological whiteness has swept the political science discipline, especially international relations. yet an important dimension of race and racism continues to be ignored: the presence and status of scho

Cyberspace has completely revolutionised our ways of life, disrupted our economies, and allowed for important progress in our societies. But the advantages of the digital revolution are now threatened by the use of cyberspace for war purposes. This article explores the states’ security dilemma as they face cyber challenges and the ambivalence of the notion of security in cyberspace. It highlights how, in ten years, cyberspace has become a battlefield and a strategic priority for many states that have represented it as a geopolitical threat for their national security, hence justifying its progressive militarisation. Meanwhile, they have become cognizant to the systemic risk of proliferation of offensive cybertools and cyber-operations. This security dilemma – one that opposes a representation of cyber threats as a geopolitical risk to that of cyberspace as a systemic risk – is at the heart of the multilateral negotiations on the regulation of cyberspace. There, a multiplicity of non-state actors has forced their way to the table through a multitude of initiatives that emphasize the importance of the challenges at stake and how difficult it will be for the states to face them

RELATED Articles

Education system in Pakistan

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus feugiat nisi non nunc elementum, id tincidunt enim scelerisque. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Maecenas fringilla, magna in dapibus scelerisque, purus enim accumsan libero, et ...